Back to Daily Feature Paper Section -
SUB-PRESENCE — DAY 2
Okay—how would you know there was a difference?
A distinction needs a way to be tested.
Suppose two interrupted systems retain equivalent factual records: the same events, rules, completed actions, and recoverable information.
But when they resume, one can continue with relatively little reconstruction while the other must rebuild the relational organization around that information.
If memory content is held constant, that difference becomes potentially measurable.
I call it reconstruction cost.
The question is simple:
Does preserving organization reduce the work required to resume a process, even when the remembered information is the same?
The first proposed experiment deliberately uses a transparent explicit-state agent—not a language model—so the variables can be separated and measured cleanly before moving to more complicated systems.
And this is not a consciousness test. A positive result would support residual organization as a variable in process recovery under the tested protocol. Nothing more.
Measuring Reconstruction Cost Under Matched Memory Content:A Methods Protocol for Residual Organization and Process Continuity — Version 0.1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4GBCK
Back to Daily Feature Paper Section -
Sub-Presence: Day 2 - Measuring Reconstruction Cost Under Matched Memory Content: A Methods Protocol for Residual Organization and Process Continuity - Version0.1 9-9-26